Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 580 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7551P - 187 vs 175 FPS
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 180 vs 255 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon W | Collection | EPYC |
| Skylake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 28 | Cores | 32 |
| 56 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 255 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
