Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 68 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 8% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 211 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 56 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 15 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
28 | Cores | 4 |
56 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 255 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
