Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1673 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 15 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 334 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 85 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
