Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 1025 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 135 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 64 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
