Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 105 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 13% better in FIFA 23 than Athlon 3000G - 146 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 35 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
| Rome | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 225 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
