Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 213 days newer than Ryzen 5 3500U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 3500U - 201 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 15 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 5 3500U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Rome | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
