Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1794 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 128 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 85 vs 225 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
64 | Cores | 6 |
128 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
