Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 2291 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 91% better in Diablo IV than EPYC 7742 - 153 vs 80 FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 47 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 47 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
