Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i7-4770HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1863 days newer than Core i7-4770HQ.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-4770HQ - 164 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770HQ - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770HQ
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 47 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-4770HQ
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770HQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 47 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5200 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
