Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1794 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 128 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 79% better in Diablo IV than EPYC 7742 - 143 vs 80 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 85 vs 225 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
64 | Cores | 8 |
128 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
