Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 497 days older than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 512 vs 501 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 47 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
