Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1794 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 201 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 128 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 105 vs 225 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rome | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
64 | Cores | 10 |
128 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
