Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1673 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
