Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1899 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 219 vs 218 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
