Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 49 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-4160T - 284 vs 283 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
