Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 121 days newer than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 197 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 128 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 93% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 15 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Rome | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
