Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i5-5257U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 1620 days newer than Core i5-5257U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 5% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-5257U - 229 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5257U - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5257U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 28 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-5257U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-5257U |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 225 W | TDP | 28 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris 6100 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
