Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 561 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than FX-6200 - 162 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
