Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 975 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |