Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 1211 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3930T - 232 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
