Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 699 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-8120 - 225 vs 222 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5667 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |