Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 737 days newer than Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Pentium G630 - 113 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G630 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
110
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |