Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 721 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 0% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 300 vs 299 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
300
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$26.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |