Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1100 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4130 - 173 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 15% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - $22.92 vs $26.99
- Up to 12% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium G4400 - $0.14 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $26.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |