Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2612 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 275 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $42.85 vs $57.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-9100F - $0.17 vs $0.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |