Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1969 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1820 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $46.41 vs $56.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing Control than Core i3-9100F - $0.23 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14375 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
199
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |