Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 150 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3033 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |