Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 488 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1840 - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
86.91910499139415%
Multi-Core
854
86.08870967741935%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |