Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 605 days older than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 0% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1840 - 275 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |