Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2805 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1840 - 135 vs 118 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
31.503431066749844%
Multi-Core
854
31.676557863501483%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |