Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 612 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than FX-4130 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74842 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |