Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 794 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6200 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 6 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |