Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 932 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 2% better in Dota 2 than FX-8120 - 168 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |