Buy on Amazon
CA$182.45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1773 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$182.45 vs CA$303.46
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8350 - 170 vs 141 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FX-Series FX-8350 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 4 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75101 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
60%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor (YD190XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
