Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1773 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than FX-8350 - 248 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$181.91 vs CA$182.45
- Up to 10% better value when playing Lost Ark than FX-8350 - CA$0.73 vs CA$0.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16121 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
248
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$181.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$181.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |