Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$182.45 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.72 vs CA$0.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than FX-8350 - 259 vs 253 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
253
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15398 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
259
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$214
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |