Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2268 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than FX-8350 - 275 vs 253 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$153.88 vs CA$182.45
- Up to 22% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-8350 - CA$0.56 vs CA$0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15790 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
275
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15791 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |