Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than FX-8350 - 279 vs 257 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$174.99 vs CA$182.45
- Up to 11% better value when playing Apex Legends than FX-8350 - CA$0.63 vs CA$0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15413 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$174.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15414 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |