Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - CA$182.45 vs CA$244.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-12600K - CA$0.81 vs CA$0.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 32% better in Lost Ark than FX-8350 - 295 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
224
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
295
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
97%
Price, CA$
CA$244.99
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |