Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2448 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - CA$182.45 vs CA$380.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 3600X - CA$1.44 vs CA$2.77 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8350 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
127
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12826 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.77/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$380
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$380 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |