Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$182.45 vs CA$434.33
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-12900KF - CA$1.27 vs CA$2.37 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-8350 - 183 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
144
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8063 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.37/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$434.33
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$434.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |