Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - CA$182.45 vs CA$359.88
- Up to 30% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-7700K - CA$4.15 vs CA$5.9 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 39% better in Starfield than FX-8350 - 61 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11321 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
61
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.9/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$359.88
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$359.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11322 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |