Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$182.45 vs CA$289.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.72 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than FX-8350 - 287 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
253
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 757 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
287
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$289
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |