Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G4400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 173 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$39.99 vs CA$209.7
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - CA$0.23 vs CA$1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
168
97.10982658959537%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
18.4%
Price, CA$
CA$209.7
19%
Buy for CA$209.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
173
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |