Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - CA$182.45 vs CA$387.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Resident Evil Village than Core i5-13500 - CA$0.62 vs CA$1.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 8% better in Resident Evil Village than FX-8350 - 314 vs 292 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
292
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10738 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
314
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$387
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$387 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10747 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |