Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$182.45 vs CA$349.79
- Up to 5% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i7-10700F - CA$1.9 vs CA$1.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 83% better in FIFA 23 than FX-8350 - 176 vs 96 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
96
54%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10922 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.99/FPS
95%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |