Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Diablo IV than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 212 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$303.46 vs CA$375.13
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$375.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74227 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
166
78.30188679245283%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
72.45657568238212%
Multi-Core
5794
80.12722998202186%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |