Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2238 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - CA$201.47 vs CA$434.43
- Up to 44% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14600KF - CA$1.11 vs CA$1.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 218 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 20 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$201.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$201.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.99/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$434.43
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$434.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |