Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 142 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 173 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$89.0 vs CA$209.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.52 vs CA$1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
173
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
170
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |