Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 123 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - CA$303.46 vs CA$322.05
- Up to 4% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i7-8700 - CA$1.31 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 235 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
232
98.72340425531915%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50509 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
95.62043795620437%
Price, CA$
CA$322.05
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$322.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50509 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
77.19762062128223%
Multi-Core
5794
98.12023708721422%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |