Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2321 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 208 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$242.72 vs CA$303.46
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
181
87.01923076923077%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
79%
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74126 minutes ago
Buy for CA$242.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
49.70212765957447%
Multi-Core
5794
51.008011268597585%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |